The map shows what an area looked like in 1986 and in the present.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate how urban design for a citizen area has changed over a year period between 1986 and the present.
Overvall, the residential space was modernised. Agricultural animals and land were displaced for the buildings of roads and architecture features. Moreover, the carbon footprints extended as roads were extended and more trees were cut down.
Firstly, agricultural features started to disappear. In 1986, cows were set free near the River Stoke and the East side, whereas nowadays, they are no longer living here. The farmland could be seen at the West and the East side of the main road, but nowadays, people built new roads and houses, replacing farms.
Secondly, the place was industrialised. There used to be only a few residents in the North. However, to this present, residential livings are growing to the South, and new constructions were planned out to extend the traffic ways. Besides, the primary school was established with new areas, although the other properties like the post office or the bridge in the North remained unchanged. On the other hand, shops were demolished.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The map shows what an area looked like in 1986 and in the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers What is the cause of this What are some possible solutions 67
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern techonologies such as smartphones and computers 67
- The diagram below shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the key features and make comparisons where necessary 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7371416559 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688888888889 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4128100149 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.75 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0802104738004 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255044694765 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376980967339 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551948983859 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050334645653 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7371416559 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688888888889 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4128100149 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.75 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0802104738004 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255044694765 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376980967339 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551948983859 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050334645653 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.