The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now.
The pictures illustrate developments of a bookshop from 2000 to the present day
Overall, there have been many significant alterations, especially to the right-hand side of the layout, along with the additions of new facilities. However, there were some figures that still remain intact
Remarkably, fiction occupied most of the bookstore in 2000, with 2 sections placed to the north and the northeast corner of the map. Nonetheless, at the moment, the northern fiction area has shared its place with 3 other categories, namely art, hobbies and cookery, which used to be put parallel to each other in the center of the map. These sections have been relocated from the position that now is placed with tables.
These tables are set in front of the coffee region, which is the replacement of a former non-fiction area. Furthermore, the placement of non-fiction is also substantially noticeable when the current position of it was the original site of fiction in 2000. Apart from those revonations, there were no differences in the entrance, travel section, new books and service desk between the two maps
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do or do you feel children have enough education at school 61
- Information technology enables many people to do their work outside their workplace e g at home when travelling etc Do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that it is a good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views a 84
- The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001 2006 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, still, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12154696133 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84878293978 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640883977901 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8023920458 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144145757398 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607410562108 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471212928872 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744759082412 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554746007447 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.