The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plan for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given maps illustrate the information on the present structure of the Islip’s central area, and its planned design for renovation. Overall, the present Islip seems to be quite simple with only shops and housing area; compared to the planned one, there are more space for new road, instead of using main road, people may turn it into pedestrians-only way
As can be seen from the former map, only a few buildings are constructed, which creates no highlight for the town. For example, shops are constructed on both sides of the road, instead of any other infrastructure. The main road is divided into two paths, one crosses the town center, and the southern one is a dead-end nearby school. As a result of the deficiency of knowledge on immovables, the Minister seems not to be capable of wholly exploiting its potentials
By contrast, the developmental plan points out various predetermined changes. In detail, Shops in the north of the main road, which may probably be adjusted to be pedestrian-only street, are intended to separate into Bus station, shopping center and car parking; moreover, The rest are used for housing purposes. It is unequivocally seen that the dual carriage toward town center is going to intentionally widen so as to surround the town. This developmental reinforcements bring about such major alterations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-24 | just_minhh | 84 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plan for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these v 78
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mall town, and the renovation plans. Overall, Islip seems quite simple, by wh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpectation with significant changes. It is obvious that the road, which would...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re can be more space spent for housing. Moreover, It is arranged that peopl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, whereas, while, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62080021177 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66875 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.936957688 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130872314116 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061431830897 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493041089527 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842364968285 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525358271989 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.