The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day.

Given are two maps depicting the modifications in the ground level of an undetermined art gallery, during a given period, from 2015 to date.

It is conspicuous that the layout of the gallery is more likely to undergo some significant changes with the addition of numerous amenities. Moreover, the most striking swings have been executed on the left side of the gallery.

To begin with, entering the entrance hall, the gate has stayed in its original position in the middle of the gallery; however, the receptionist has been relocated upward to the center of the hall. It has stairs linking the two sides of the gallery but a novel elevator has been constructed which leads to a move to the left side of the stairs.

On the left-hand side of the art gallery, a temporary exhibition space and an area for children have been erected on the original site of exhibition room number four. Furthermore, a gallery office has been demolished to make way for a vending machine. A gallery shop has been converted into a café; however it is smaller than the cafe because of the extension of the staircase. While there have not been differences among three distinct exhibition rooms 1, 2, 3 on the right-hand side in the past up to now.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-18 nnglinh 84 view
2021-08-29 datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com 73 view
2021-07-16 TranMinhDuc 78 view
2021-07-05 Trangdodo 84 view
2021-07-05 Trangdodo 67 view
Essays by user nhinhi999 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7488372093 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69581331151 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.285892166 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114047173722 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04687436507 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500156144788 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770021318379 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522041126654 0.0819641961636 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.