Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work. Do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, museums and art galleries occupy a pivotal role in our society which bring a myriad of knowledge from a wide array of time periods. It is thought by some people that these exhibition buildings should pay more attention to showcase their regional cultural values and histories instead of masterpieces from over the world. From my perspective, I completely contradict the statement and this essay will address the explanations for my views as follows.
To begin with, international work of art in local museums does a favor for the residents to broaden their horizon in distinct nations' history. The habitants who desire to discover art works in other parts of the globe are not likely to go overseas to see great artifacts in person. Museums are a great opportunity for people of all ages to learn about other countries which bring them a new vision from historical and cultural aspects. For instance, Vietnam Art Museum stores 400 objects of foregin countries; Vietnamese people, therefore, can come here to enjoy them.
In addition, exhibiting foreign pieces of art seemingly is an excellent manner to attract local tourists and might increase the amount of visitors. Museums normally expose their own artworks. In the long run, visitors will become weary since they may have seen all of the pieces on display. If great oversea masterpieces of top-notch artists such as Leonardo da Vinci are exhibited in domestic art galleries, they will pique the interest of everyone, particularly art aficionados. They can witness incredible artwork that was previously accessible via the internet. Therefore, the number of visitors will increase as a result, and the exhibition buildings will flourish to become a popular destination for tourists.
To sum up, national artefacts and artworks, as well as foreign collections, make museums and art galleries more diverse and efficient for exchanging cultural aspects.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day 84
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ts to broaden their horizon in distinct nations history. The habitants who desire to di...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 262, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...l become weary since they may have seen all of the pieces on display. If great oversea mas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26774193548 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82168833822 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61935483871 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9503569395 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208526754959 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671615990105 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592900381392 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116587899997 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640512090638 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.