The maps detail the divergences of a specific town from 1965 to the present day. Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the density of accommodation has grown, which stems from the increasing rate of residents.
In 1995, in that town, the river, which runs from the north to the south of town, was the central leading to the living on its banks. There were a few Assford houses to the northeast of the town and the forest at the opposite bank. The bridges were not constructed initially at that time; thus roads on both banks were separated. Nevertheless, the ferry was the only option to cross the river.
Nowadays, the former forest is replaced by the car park, two new of which were added to the south and near Assford houses. Buildings for living purposes are erected at the south, numerous small figures run along the right banks. In addition, pupils vary their choices to cross the bridge due to the ferry in 1995 being transformed into two kinds of bridge: road bridge and footbridge. The former was built for vehicles, while the latter was only used by people going on foot.
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 11
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
- With the development of social media more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the Internet What potential problems may this trend lead to What solutions can you suggest to deal with it 89
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66836734694 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3997333862 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3156954548 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0342720854241 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0189767284338 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569301853015 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.031924458495 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045148002175 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.