The maps below show changes in a local theatre in England in 2010 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps depict the theatre as a proposed site which has been renovated between 2010 and 2012 in the United Kingdom.
Overall, it is clear that the main changes involved the addition of restaurants that will be able to rest for visitors after performing concerts.
Starting from the main entrance, in 2010, it could be seen that the café was located on the right corner of the map and it opposite two offices, namely the admin office and the ticket office, nevertheless, by 2012, it was proposed that had been relocated of ticket office which more convenient to audiences approaching to buy tickets. In addition, the space of restaurants had been constructed alongside the administration office to be laid on top of restaurants which could be aimed to keep eyesight to all the operation of the theatre.
Moving on to the top of the theatre, there have been remaining seating areas in the auditorium and stage during the period, further media space as alter as a hall accessing the storage erected on the outside of the right-hand of its area in 2012. At that time, it appeared that the shower linked to the media space had been replaced in 2012 as it was widely extended as shown on the left of the maps.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67757009346 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59158811099 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556074766355 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0055172953 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.833333333 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6666666667 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101768560173 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550340759857 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460463511472 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723961356756 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04125444705 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.