The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Presented are the diagram exhibits how clothes are recycled from plastic bottles.
Overall, as can be seen that there are divided into 8 stages which are stored in 3 main steps, commencing with purchasing, and discarding the new plastic, and culminating with converting into the new products and is also launching these products to the market once again.
It can be noticed that people who are displayed in shops that could be possessed these stuffs. In this stage, bags and rubbish will be sorted from domestic users and then it sent to the landfill. Nevertheless, gathering all bottles are being contained prior to being the plastic bottle collected to transferring to the factory.
Following these steps, after undertaking the assemble of plastic bottles, they will be moved into the factory where are totally proceeding for category in different commodities. After that, it is loaded into the trucks that are carry out transform to another factory where is processed to making new products. Eventually, recycled plastic products are distributing to the retail shops and the life-cycle of recycling plastic bottles will recure in this manner.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ollowing these steps, after undertaking the assemble of plastic bottles, they will be moved ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27173913043 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71542863905 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9658614874 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171727756535 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802621519444 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568785212489 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109407119641 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621871976406 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.