The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the developments of the coastal town -Youngsville, New Zealand- between 1980 and 2005.
In 1980, Youngsville was a green town with numerous trees and individual houses. However, green life was no longer in this town, and there were dramatic changes instead after 25 years.
The most noticeable is that the residential area to the north of the Alanah river was demolished to make way for the stadium, golf course, and car parking facilities. Furthermore, the railway was expanded across the river to the North. A new marina was also constructed at the mouth of the river.
To the South of the Alanah river, woodland and houses no longer existed and were replaced by the industrial estate with factories and skyscrapers along the railway. Additionally, there was a warehouse erected adjacent to the school and the airport which remained unchanged throughout the whole period.
Overall, having been a rural area, Youngsville developed into an industrial town over the 25 years, from 1980.
- The number of international visitors going to Australia continues to grow making the Australian government very aware of the importance of its tourism industry The chart below shows the spending patterns of these visitors while they are in Australia Summa 11
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays many families move overseas for job opportunoties Some people think this is beneficial for the children of these families while others think children will find it difficult Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with the projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18181818182 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77000860259 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654545454545 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.41733409 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138736959384 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579197965571 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564560483581 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087170729733 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596781937728 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.