The maps illustrate an area in 1990 before the construction of a hydroelectric dam, and the same area in 2000 after
the dam was constructed.
Overall, it is clear that the area of rare plants and animals which existed in 1990 was destroyed, and that the
villages were relocated south of the dam in 2000.
In 1990, an ancient structure and an area with rare plants and animals were located to the west of the river. On the
east bank of the river, there was irrigated farmland and some villages nearby. However, in 2000 a lake was created
which covered this whole area. The lake was used for sailing and fishing, while a hotel occupied the site where
the villages had been located.
The map for 2000 shows the hydroelectric dam in the mountains south of the lake. On both sides of the river,
there were electricity pylons. The new site for the villages was on the east side of the river, south of the electricity
installations.
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produced electricity 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64670658683 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54731130123 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497005988024 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7839931762 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133385615614 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651539560344 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111799477398 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066000857181 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953682106613 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.