The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The pictures demonstrate a number of significant alterations which took place in a town after the building of a hydroelectric power dam between 1990 and 2010.
From the maps, it is clear that the most noticeable changes between two years is about the river separated by the hydroelectric dam. Several features of this area are disappeared as well as updated news facilities.
Let’s have a look at the maps, there was a long river spreading from the north to the south which was surrounded by age-old structures, rare plants and animals, and irrigated farmlands in 1990. However, ten years later, all of these features faded away and were replaced by a big lake where residents could fish and boat.
Looking at the maps in more detail, the villages used to be located to the east of the town. However, this settlement was moved to the south and closed to the river in 2010. Having said that, there are some updated facilities like a hotel and there were a number of electric pylons had been constructed.
- schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in country in 1985 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 89
- schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lectric power dam between 1990 and 2010. From the maps, it is clear that the most...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ared as well as updated news facilities. Let’s have a look at the maps, there was...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake where residents could fish and boat. Looking at the maps in more detail, the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68745232516 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8259394289 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155919442881 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675174876878 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106084471892 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102990752894 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895039103092 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.