The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The mapping pictures depict a number of significant changes which took place after removing some constructions. One of the most prominent projects was the construction of a hydroelectric dam.
From the maps, the most obvious feature was the appearance of a large lake. In addition, there were buildings that had been removed
In 1990, the land for irrigation had been replaced by electric posts. Furthermore, the appearance of a large lake for entertainment and a dam shortened the river's length. And the location of the ancient architecture had disappeared and the place where it was in 2010 became a wasteland. And in 2010 a big hotel appeared next to the lake
Looking at the maps in more detail, the area for rare plants and animals had disappeared and was replaced by a dense wall of pillars. Meanwhile, the villages still existed but had been relocated from afar in the east to beside the river
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar graph below shows the entrolment of students in music in an Australian university from 2000 ta 2006 and the pir chart shows how they choose their career after their course 84
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002 Press Renault Rover Types of advertising millions of dollars
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of Australian people who were born in different places of the world 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rivers'' or 'river's'?
Suggestion: rivers'; river's
...r entertainment and a dam shortened the rivers length. And the location of the ancient...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92207792208 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90796012346 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0596052608 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116044532532 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556231347774 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744349821998 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080916196773 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109509207337 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.