The maps below show the changes in a town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in a town after a construction of a hydroelectric power dam.

The map illustrate the transformation of an area between 1980 and 2010.

Overall, the observed area underwent modernization with the erections of facilities and accommodation. Moreover, the river experienced a dramatic expansion over the period.

From 1980 to 2010, the initial ancient structures in the northwestern part of the area was demolished. A vast area of forest and rare floral and fauna on the west bank was also cut down for the expansion of the lake. Over the period, the river was expanded into a lake, taking place of the irrigated farmland opposing the area of organisms. Fishing was introduced to the area by 2010.

In the southern part of the area, the flow of the river was interrupted by the construction of a hydroelectric dam. Electricity poles were also erected along the riverbanks by 2010. The village used to be in the vicinity of the farmland but it was then relocated further to the south. A hotel was constructed in the initial place of the village.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-26 chathurika2008@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user code6127 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The map illustrate the transformation of an area between 1...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92814371257 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98293760266 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5025521329 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8181818182 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1818181818 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0594966676409 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280167241388 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536298166532 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427432673304 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464064213885 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.