The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The map given below shows a factory area in the city of Norbiton, and projected future progression of the site. Overall it can be seen, industrial areas in the past just have some factories and farmland while in present years there will be lots of new buildings such as houses, playground, school, medical centre and shops. However, in both years, located in the west is a town.

At first, in the past, farmland located in the north side which ran through the river. Then in the south that opposite the farmland, there were many factories. Last, the town was in the far west from the factory.

However, in present years, all of the factories are have demolished since it becomes residential area. In the north of the center and beside the farmland, it is placed a house. However, playground is situated in front of the meadow and behind two houses then near it is a school. To the extent, kids do not need to walk far if they want to play and socialize with other children. Close to the center of the town, from west to south provided some shops whereas a clinic is opposite of it. Furthermore, it is an effective idea thus the residents can buy daily consumption without driving a car. Later, exercises including walk, run or jog will be more interested since the primary facilities are near one another.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... factory. However, in present years, all of the factories are have demolished since it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...present years, all of the factories are have demolished since it becomes residential...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63090128755 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4722296701 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613733905579 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1925981862 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113591373273 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390771984234 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724247244849 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787369266725 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717986418619 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.