The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned 4s future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given two pictures depict an industrial zone that is part of a town called Norbiton as it is now and after regeneration.
From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that this area will be through a host of changes. The most noticeable alteration is that this area will become increasingly populated, with the construction of a large number of houses.
At present, in the center of this area, there is a roundabout surrounded by factories, a road leading to the east with houses on either side and a main road to the south of the map. Moreover, this zone is bordered to the north by a river, on the other side of which is farmland.
According to the proposed plans, around the old roundabout, those factories will be demolished to make way for new houses or amenities such as shops and medical centers.
On top of that, a new and smaller roundabout will be erected in the south of the area. To the eastern road, there will be some houses on either side, a playground to the north, and a school at the end of it. The road network will be expanded somewhat, with a bridge crossing the river allowing access to the new residential area and the agricultural land will be reduced in size to the north.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...gly populated, with the construction of a large number of houses. At present, in the center of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, such as, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52272727273 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6941741555 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0505807352 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895184220287 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413403394319 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383677111628 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581056302245 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377407507764 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.