The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned 4s future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the future development of Norbiton town, which is from the industrial area to the residential one. Overall, it is clear that all the factories will be demolished, and more housing will be established. With only one main road and a roundabout, the town is mostly vacant, but it will offer many infrastructures for residents.
Looking at the maps more closely, one can see that in the middle of the map, the roundabout will be shrunken and the smaller one will be built on the junction of the main road and the Southern exit of the previous roundabout. There will be two more exits to the north and the west of the town. Along the western exits, three blocks of housing will be established. There will be a new lane from the roundabout to the north and over the river. There will be a large block of residences. On the corner of the southern and western exits, shops will be built for residents.
In the east, along the new road, there will be three new housing and a playground for people living in the residential area. At the end of the eastern exit, the school will be opened.
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 84
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 81
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned 4s future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.515 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5864599359 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.661859936 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0909090909 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758611507279 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411823476584 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769930555691 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692387312848 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606243632077 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.515 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5864599359 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.661859936 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0909090909 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758611507279 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411823476584 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769930555691 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692387312848 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606243632077 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.