the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
The provided maps elucidate the reconstruction of an industrial landscape in Norbiton’s town. Overall, it is clear to see that the infrastructures of the town will be significantly widespread and followed by the addition of more facilities available, including accommodations and leisure areas.
First and foremost, the traffic will be redeveloped notably. While there is only one roundabout, which is approached from the main road and bounded by several houses, the recent roundabout will be recreated to lead to more other roads, which seems to be available to add more accommodations and other facilities. Additionally, from the location of the traffic circle, the town is going to have one northern way across a river by a bridge which expands the housing availability in which is now taken place primarily by farmland.
Moving to the new facilities being added in the industrial area of the town. Given the expansion of traffic roads, along with more accommodation built, the area will see the rise of a shop and a medical center around the traffic circle. Furthermore, a playground and a school will also be created in the pedestrian zone, where citizens are easy to approach, such as the position between the river bank and housing and the location at the end of the current road, respectively.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Some people think that young people should spend free time with families instead of outside entertainment others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10280373832 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11349638281 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9713850788 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114294463541 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753003899757 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108646817628 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982003923062 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747953273229 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10280373832 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11349638281 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570093457944 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9713850788 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114294463541 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753003899757 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108646817628 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982003923062 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747953273229 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.