The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided bar chart illustrates the fluctuation in the beverage preference of Australian citizens in different five urban areas in the last 4 weeks, ranging from taking away fresh or instant coffee to drinking at a cafe.
Overall, it is evident that while there was slightly equal in the habit of buying instant coffee, the other two habits witnessed a significant disparity while comparing those five cities surveyed over the last 4 weeks.
According to the graph, Brisbane and Hobart citizens preferred taking instant coffee away equally, accounting for approximately 55 percent over the four-week period. Similarly, the percentage of this habit preferred by Adailade and Melbourne achieved 50 percent and 48 percent, although only Sydney experienced the smallest percentage of 45 percent in this preference.
On the other hand, while going to a cafe and buying fresh coffee in the last 4 weeks in Brisbane and Adelaide accounted for the smallest percentage, respectively 55 percent and 34 percent in Brisbane and 49 percent and 34 percent in Adelaide, the other four cities witnessed higher percentages in both preferences. For example, in comparing in terms of going to a cafe, Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart amounted to approximately 63 percent of each regions; in terms of buying fresh coffee, 44 percent, 42 percent and 38 percent respectively.
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 61
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottle 61
- More and more people are becoming overweight Some people suggest that increasing the price of fattening food is a solution to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- in the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people traveling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vihecles outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28703703704 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92221694127 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.9184446154 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.333333333 112.824112599 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 22.9334400587 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0961497067133 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569118590979 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457716574737 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758580167862 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447039403217 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.