The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013

Essay topics:

The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013.

The given map outlines the changes to the layouts of the nature museum, in 2010 and 2013.

From an overall perspective, it can be seen that the layouts of the museum experienced significant changes, with the focus on the eastern region.

Looking at the graph for more details, the entrance, there was a complex of ticket desk, the lobby, and the ocean hall situated at the center of the map. On the left hand, there is a mammal sector in the northwest region and a dinosaur sector in the southwest region. On the other hand, there is a huge garden in the east area.

Looking at the graph for more details, the ocean hall, which is situated in the north area was expanded, and the complex of the main entrance, the ticket desk, the lobby, and the
dinosaur sector remain unchanged. The mammal sector was shrunk, and replaced by the ice age and the insects sector. For the rest of the map, the mammal sector was relocated to the garden's original location. Not only that, it contains a complex of human ongins display in the eastern area and the shop and cafe located in the southern region, respectively

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-10 Sella view
2023-07-10 Sella 60 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here is a huge garden in the east area. Looking at the graph for more details, t...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'insects'' or 'insect's'?
Suggestion: insects'; insect's
...nk, and replaced by the ice age and the insects sector. For the rest of the map, the ma...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62626262626 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33451367233 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0097383153 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135521825774 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767797136495 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153945306569 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129218199588 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189439623297 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.