Tourists office
The given line graph provides a comparison of the number of requests for information in Britain’s tourist office between January and June.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that while the number of requests for information made in person and by telephone saw an upward trend, the opposite was true for the number of requests for information by letter/email.
Looking at the graph for more details, at the beginning of the period shown, the number of requests made by telephone was the highest, at around 850. The figure for requests through letter/email was lower, around 690. However, the requests for information from residents, who came in person accounted for the lowest number, at nearly 410.
For the rest of the graph, in the period from January to June, in-person requests for information saw an increase in the number, reaching a peak of approximately 1900. There was also a significant rise in the number of requests made by telephone, at precisely 1600 in June. In contrast, a constant decrease was seen in the figure for letter/email requests, around 390 at the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-16 | truong3011 | 67 | view |
- Comparison of energy production 67
- Percentage of households with electrical appliances
- Annual rice production 67
- Male and female olympics participants 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for the lowest number, at nearly 410. For the rest of the graph, in the period...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.../email requests, around 390 at the end.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06593406593 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87458748872 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2189119728 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0462656455356 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336006219732 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888988896381 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0672012439464 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116395968847 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.