The maps illustrate the transformation of Happy Valley shopping center in the year 1982 and 2012.
Overall, the centre underwent a number of changes, the most dramatic of which were the disappearance of the lake and the development of the parking lot.
In the southwest area of the shopping mall, the path leading to the center and the lobby area was demolished to make way for the parking lot and the main entrance. Furthermore, in the vicinity of the parking section, the furniture retail was erected on the original site of the lake, while the coffee shop and food store were removed and replaced by sports store and electronics shop.
In addition, to the east of the building, the initial three shops were divided into four sections with the introduction of a food store and a chain of themed restaurants. Additionally, in the middle of the centre, the entertainment area, adjacent to toilets and an elevator still exist.
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 80
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfalland temperature for one region of East Africa 78
- The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012 78
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to toilets and an elevator still exist.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, still, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 773.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89240506329 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81389444059 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7048135901 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205758130519 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1206298942 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190522396394 0.0843802449381 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166907446463 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219015931907 0.0819641961636 267% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.