These days, opinions diverge regarding whether studying with peers or alone is more beneficial. In this essay, I am going to examine this question from both points of view and give my own opinion on why I am inclined to support the former.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the benefits of studying with others outweighs its disadvantages. The main reason for believing is that students can forge bonds with other people in the group and enhance their communication skills. In other words, teamwork has a tendency to require attachment among members for the purpose of gaining better results. One compelling illustration of this is that studying groups are likely to facilitate the success in the future career which needs collaboration between colleagues. It is also possible to say that studying in a team would foster the development of personal skills as schoolchildren can promote their strength in certain fields. This incentive leads to the betterment of such skills and their academic performance at school.
It is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that studying alone can boost the concentration skill as students might entirely focus on their learning. This will upgrade their productivity, thereby resulting in accomplishing greater achievements. A second point is that studying without friends may help students pay attention to their weaknesses and control the pace of learning. People often have this opinion because they have a chance to pause to comprehend, review and absorb information befitting their own academic levels. A particularly convincing example is that pupils can avoid getting overwhelmed and peer pressure if they study on their own.
In conclusion, I believe that both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that studying with fellows offers more benefits to students as it could improve their interaction and personal skills. Additionally, it is highly recommended that pupils should allocate more time on having a revision for information and knowledge gained from group discussions.
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 80
- Developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice is needed Discuss 89
- The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
These days, opinions diverge regarding whether study...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3313253012 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90628782595 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5375481793 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.117647059 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277396936216 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837327444234 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515119228573 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167389276875 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421243913981 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.