The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
The maps shed lights on how the museum had been transformed during the 20-year period, in 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the maps, the area had experienced a significant modification in its overall layout. What is most noticeable is the extension of the parking space and the replacement of some amenities.
Considering the outside space of the museum, time period witnessed the disappearance of the South-East garden with a view to make way for the expansion of the parking area. Along with the garden, the area which used to be a cottage in 1990 had been conversed into a coffee shop.
In terms of the inside facilities, while the entrance and restaurants were kept intact during the mention period, the shop had been widened to the West boundary, hence, sized down the space for the existing exhibition room. The exhibition area in the corner, to the right of the entrance, which was separated as two in 1990 had been merged into one in 2010. The maps shed lights on how the museum had been transformed during the 20-year period, in 1990 and 2010.
As can be seen from the maps, the area had experienced a significant modification in its overall layout. What is most noticeable is the extension of the parking space and the replacement of some amenities.
Considering the outside space of the museum, time period witnessed the disappearance of the South-East garden with a view to make way for the expansion of the parking area. Along with the garden, the area which used to be a cottage in 1990 had been conversed into a coffee shop.
In terms of the inside facilities, while the entrance and restaurants were kept intact during the mention period, the shop had been widened to the West boundary, hence, sized down the space for the existing exhibition room. The exhibition area in the corner, to the right of the entrance, which was separated as two in 1990 had been merged into one in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-31 | ratunugraheni | 60 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | hinhin411 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | Phuong1810 | view | |
| 2023-08-26 | HASAN.511 | view |
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74850299401 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64069819537 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.287425149701 0.547539520022 52% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 283.868780488 169% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3617907605 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.42857142857 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120886390579 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601269175012 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657195216581 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799387619514 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588636400065 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.