Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems is a heated debate in this day and age considering its crucial role in our daily life. There is a rising argument about whether conserving the environment is the work of governments only, not individuals as their tiny contribution to the matter. From my perspective, both politicians and individuals have to lend a helping hand to deal with this problem more efficiently.
First and foremost, it is undeniable that some of the environmental issues is too enormous for ones to tackle on their own. Such global issues like: prolonged drought, greenhouse effect, sea level rise, extreme weather events and so on, which are taken place on a large scale, require the efforts and cooperation of gigantic corporations and governments to address. Moreover, the application of modern science research to mitigate environment issues do demand not only the work of professional scientists but also abundant resources which can only be paid by politicians and huge companies.
The second point to take into consideration is that every citizen’s lives is surrounded by the environment. Hence, environmental preservation is not only the work of governments but also the responsibility of each individuals. Little to nothing can be done within the contribution of one person but together we can bring about massive effect. By accomplishing small actions like: not dumping litters, saving energy, using bicycles instead of motorbikes or cars whenever possible, each person has made a great contribution to the protection of environment.
In conclusion, conserving the environment requires the contribution of both individuals and governments to achieve the best result.
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 56
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses for example food and drink industries Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rst and foremost, it is undeniable that some of the environmental issues is too enormous fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...paid by politicians and huge companies. The second point to take into considerat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49230769231 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27592978806 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6450373783 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.818181818 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191949522794 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619040347409 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283958073353 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975256125416 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0179888704627 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.