The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate numerous proposed changes to a road system to reduce the number of road accidents.
It is clear that the main change will be made to the areas which frequently have accidents. These involved a new roundabout and new traffic lights.
Looking at the picture in more detail, we can see that there will be an addition of a large roundabout at the intersection of Forest Road and City Road. Currently, this area is a hotspot for crashes. Moreover, they also installed 4 new traffic lights on the west side of the City Road as the entrance of the school is an accident-prone area.
The two maps also show that changes will also be made to the City Road and the supermarket. A part of the City Road will be straightened to improve traffic safety. Finally, according to the plan, the supermarket will be accessed via a designated driveway from the east side of the roundabout.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | Han Duyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-26 | haphuongpham49 | 72 | view |
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 61
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 61
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 77
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- The maps show the changes of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70886075949 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76358424024 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1329046288 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154555990091 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703546905377 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086151704342 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120181242566 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958626593238 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.