The number of visitors to two different tourist attractions in the city of Grenby during a particular week.
The line graph provides information how many people visited two different kind of holiday site in Grenby city in a certain day for a week. Grenby Amusement Museum had more visitors than History Park.
Grenby Amusement Museum was low early in the week but peaked up on the weekend. People who visited Amusement park on Tuesday was 350 and 300 on Wednesday. Furthermore, the visitors rose up on Thursday until Sunday exponentially.
In contrast, Grenby History Museum also got fewer visitors during the week than on the weekend. On Monday, there are around 280 visitors. This number slightly decline in each day until Thursday and then rose back to 400 visitors on Saturday. Then fell slightly on Sunday around 50 people.
To conclude, Grenby Amusement Park had more visitors than History Museum. The lowest number of visitors of Amusement Park was on Wednesday and History Museum was on Thursday. Both places had highest visitors on Saturday.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-27 | Bonita Melinda Pangaribuan | 88 | view |
- In some places money earned from tourism has become an important part of the economy What are the advantaged and disadvantages of relying on tourism as a major source of revenue 87
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefit that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both view and give your opinion 81
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Number of children in an average class at different ages in different countries 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph provides information how ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...n how many people visited two different kind of holiday site in Grenby city in a cer...
^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...ory Museum was on Thursday. Both places had highest visitors on Saturday.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, then, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08974358974 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53050910517 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544871794872 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1788060812 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.1666666667 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245005026656 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880695496937 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690697889034 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156579547453 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588970796277 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.35 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.