The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries (2000 - 2012)
The line chart elucidates the percentage of women working in parliament in several European countries within 20 years.
In general, the proportion of females in parliament increased in all countries, with Italy making up the highest. A considerable gap was seen between the female percentage in the UK and Belgium’s parliament.
From 2000 to 2008, the figure for females working in Parliament in German and France increased by 3% and 4%, consecutively, while 5% rose was shown in Belgium's parliament. Italy's parliament showed a 10% increase in women politicians. Although the proportion of women in the British parliament jumped steeply by 10%, the figure remained the lowest eventually.
In the next four years, a moderate rose was seen in women in the German parliament by less than one in ten, while those in Italy jumped by 5%, surpassing those in German. While the figure in France and The UK showed an upward trend of 3% and 5%, respectively, women in Belgium's parliament dropped slightly by 5% at the end of the period.
- Many students are now refusing to choose science subjects at their university level Why do you think this is happening and what is the impact on the community 78
- Some people think that drug addicts should be treated as criminals and sent to jail while others believe that they should be treated as patients and sent hospitals 73
- Time Spent Per Activity of People in Several Countries From 1998 to 2009 85
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give you own opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04651162791 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94897567718 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0329245402 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255004058697 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121168203618 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772056625875 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171994379761 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731155859551 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.