Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos, or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?
It is trus that public libraries should accomodate many books in their fasilities. However, a costly advanced technologies such as software, videos, and dvds are necessary since it makes learning easier and provides vivid documentaries.
High-tech digital media in public libraries makes the learning activities become much easier since all the information is packed in one device. As everything is packed, people could look for the knowledge they want in only one click away without having to waste their time as in the printed documents. For instance, a survey conducted by the Yale School of Journalism in 2017 found that students who used e-book as their paper references tend to submit their assignments faster than those who used printed books. The reason was that students found information easier in e-books which located in libraries' computers than in the printed books located on the shelves.
A groundbreaking digital media is also needed in public libraries as it provides more vivid documentaries. This helps people attain more complete information of certain courses since digital media shows it is not only words, but also, pictures, motion graphics, and sound. This experience enables more sense in the brain which makes people understand better. According to an NCBI study in 2016 towards Anthropology students of Harvard University found that more than 80% of respondents can recall the World War II events chronologically in more detail after watching a film documentary compared to those who studied by books.
In all, even though it is good for public libraries to serve many books to their readers, however, innovative media technologies are also needed to support the learning process. Those technologies certainly could help people to learn better.
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 61
- Many people in the music business feel that illegal music sites on the internet are a serious threat to the industry and more should be done to prevent them from operating To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 62
- In many countries schools have several problems with student s behaviour What do you think are causes of this what solutions can you suggest 73
- Car drivers and cyclists share the same roads and this can cause problems for both of them Why is this the case What measures can be taken to solve these problems 73
- Some people think school should groups pupils according to their academic ability but others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'technology'?
Suggestion: technology
... fasilities. However, a costly advanced technologies such as software, videos, and dvds are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...es certainly could help people to learn better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79991800171 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0189361341 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20153775459 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816976823275 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703960403028 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132706502079 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579380645191 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'technology'?
Suggestion: technology
... fasilities. However, a costly advanced technologies such as software, videos, and dvds are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...es certainly could help people to learn better.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, look, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37142857143 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79991800171 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560714285714 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0189361341 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20153775459 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816976823275 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703960403028 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132706502079 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579380645191 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.