Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals.
The first circular layout depicts the information about the average expenditure on restaurant and home made meals, and the linear representation reveals the comparison between utilisation of junk food and sit-down restaurant meals per year: 1970, 1980, 1990 and 2000. Collaboration of data is done in percentage.
Overall, it is crystal clear that, the total expenses on restaurant feed had been increased through out the years. Although, the number of meals for sit-down restaurant showed significant increment, per year.
It can be seen that, in the year 1970, just 10% of the total amount spent on restaurant meals, less than that of home cooking, that was 90%, and it further showed decreased trend till 2000. Moreover, the cost of bar feed were sugerd by 15 and 35%, respectively, during 1980 and1990. Apart from this, the budget was contemplated half for the same profile, in 2000.
Moving further, in the linear layout, the consumption of junk food and sit-down restaurant meals were similar, that was 20 meals, in 1970. Furthermore, the number of meals for fast food and sit-down restaurant showed steady increase till 1980 at nearly about 27 and 35, respectively. In contrast, the utilisation of sit-down restaurant meals were dramatically inclined to about 85 meals, as compared to junk food, which exceeded to more than 40 meals, from 1990 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | Navroop kaur | 84 | view |
- A century's future depends on its young people . Therefore, it is often argued that government should invest heavily on its youth. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- The table show the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 78
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals. 84
- A century s future depends on its young people Therefore it is often argued that government should invest heavily on its youth Do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...s on restaurant feed had been increased through out the years. Although, the number of meal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, apart from, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79170641468 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563063063063 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9597449962 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.7 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446397341612 0.215688989381 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17248980183 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136970088467 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272290673406 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941964815851 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.