The figure reveals rating of 5 significant factors considered by set of individuals grouped by age in choosing where to live. It is clearly seen that priorities of all age groups are the same except for ages 55 to 64 and it also shows that crime rate is the top priority of all ages.
Ages 25 to 54 individuals have the same ratings of priorities that they consider when purchasing houses. Their main consideration is crime rate whic had the highest percentage compared to other factors with almost above 80% on all ages. It is followed by availability of schools in the area with above 50% rating for ages 25 to 44 but this decreases as people get older with only 30% in ages 45 to 54. Older adults, ages 55 to 64, however, rate it as their 3rd priority with less than 25%.
Shopping facilities rank 3rd in importance among the group of individuals except for ages 55 to 64 which considers it as their 2nd factor to considered. Parks and public transport follow with less than 15% for ages up to 45 to 54 but it increases up to 20% as the people ages.
- The bar chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 11
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000. 56
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40306122449 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.542777499 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.919558082 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14314879086 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728253499007 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316692853875 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990647547445 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294595267253 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.