The table chart represents the information regarding the percentage of people who use many features of the mobile phone in the three given period from 2006 to 2010. Data is calibrated in the ratio.
Overall, It can be observed from that graph that making the calls was the most popular feature in the given time period. However, both take photos and play music were followed an upward trend.
It is experienced from the graph that people gave the top priority to calls which were 100% in all the years . As well as, take photos to start with only66% and reached at 76% bin the last year, By contrast, in 2010, it was experienced twofold rise that of 2006 in people used to play music feature of mobile phone As is observed in the table data, both in 2006 and in 2008 every single cell phone users used call making features. Interestingly 1 percent users in the year 2010 did not use the cell phone for making calls. Taking photos was another popular feature of cell phone and 66% cell phone users used this feature in 2006 while this reached over 70% in the other two years. Sending and receiving text messages was the second most used feature as more than 70% users used this in these given periods. Playing games is a feature that was rarely done by cell phone users in 2006 (only 17%) but got its popularity in later years (over 40% in the respective years). No data was provided for internet searching in the year 2006 but that also got its popularity and was used by 73% cell phone users in 2010 though it was less popular in 2008. Finally listening to music and video recording were two less popular feature of cell phone but eventually they both got more priority in 2010 (26% & 35% respectively) than the earlier years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o calls which were 100% in all the years . As well as, take photos to start with o...
^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...By contrast, in 2010, it was experienced twofold rise that of 2006 in people used...
^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to play music feature of mobile phone As is observed in the table data, both i...
^^^
Line 5, column 1144, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...010 though it was less popular in 2008. Finally listening to music and video recording ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1213, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'feature' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'features'.
Suggestion: features
...d video recording were two less popular feature of cell phone but eventually they both ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, regarding, second, so, well, while, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52715654952 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16923215751 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482428115016 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 428.4 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5287210838 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304501754167 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122335255521 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105794009788 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215249273167 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129327316622 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.