Petersburg Art Museum before and after renovations
The diagram illustrates a building sketch of old Petersburg Art Museum and after its renovation. Overall the main change to the Art Museum are new construction of cafeteria and a classroom which was demolished.
Old building had a lobby located next to the entrance door. The Building had 2 classrooms. The first was located next to the east of lobby, while the second was in the north-east. The Art Museum also had 2 museum rooms. The first one is ancient art room was located in the north of lobby, while the second (modern art room) was in the north of the first one. Additionally, there was a sculpture room in the east of modern art room.
After that, the building is renovated and have several changes. First, modern art gallery is expanded by relocated sculpture room to outside of museum building in the east of modern art gallery. Moreover, ancient art room also is expanded by removing the second classroom. However, a cafeteria is constructed to the east of ancient art room which located in the outside.
To conclude, the main change are expansion of 2 art rooms by relocated sculpture room and destroyed the second classroom. Additionally a new building was constructed too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-30 | Dister | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | Bonita Melinda Pangaribuan | 67 | view |
- Many stores sell organic fruits and vegetables produced without the use of chemical fertilizers pesticides and herbicides even though the often cost more than conventional fruits and vegetables Why do some people prefer to eat organic food Do you think or 56
- Petersburg Art Museum before and after renovations 67
- Men and women can never share the same responsibilities at home and in everyday life Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 56
- Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 87
- More and more business and individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The diagram illustrates a building sketc...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and a classroom which was demolished. Old building had a lobby located next to...
^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...while the second was in the north-east. The Art Museum also had 2 museum rooms. The...
^^^
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The Art Museum also had 2 museum rooms. The first one is ancient art room was locat...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e room in the east of modern art room. After that, the building is renovated an...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt room which located in the outside. To conclude, the main change are expansi...
^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...oom and destroyed the second classroom. Additionally a new building was constructed too.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83823529412 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74822563427 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387254901961 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5702537382 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249340437267 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10472061893 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102929445322 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17927216017 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104624767357 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.