The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles.
The given picture illustrates how garment is created from recycled plastic bottles.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the clothes produced from used bottles project is a linear process which consists of 13 steps. This operation begins with assembling used bottles and culminating with final products such as T-shirt.
The process commences with collecting bottles and transporting these to the factories. In the fourth stage, the assembled bottles are selected and sorted out in order to put into the cutting machine. Next, the manufacturer will wash these used flagons and dry them under the sun for 10 hours.
After being desiccated for 10 hours, these materials are heated, which turns them into liquid components. In the next stage, this work-in-process material is strained and shaped into a mold. Subsequently, this becomes yarn which is ready for sewing and knitting into dressmaking fabric. Finally, after the weaving stage, the fabric is rolled in one axis and delivered to tailors or other businesses so as to manufacture the costume for consumers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...elivered to tailors or other businesses so as to manufacture the costume for consumers. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30994152047 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77958082449 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654970760234 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2505670037 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190629749085 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751099309522 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904874304635 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135582491237 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900915541756 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.