The diagram manifests a reprocessing measure of squandered glass flasks.
First of all, thrown- away bootles are gathered from every place such as restaurants, schools, etc. Then, they are conveyed to collecting point. Subsequently, they are continuously transported to factory where they are recycleed. In stage 2, these bottles are laid in high-pressure water whereabouts to scrub them. After this step, they are classified into 3 ilks: green, brown, clear.
After that, they are imparted to glass mills. In there, workers crash them into teeny pieces. And they put them into furnace with high temperature (from 600c to 800c) to burn them into liquid. Then this and new liquid glass are poured into glass moulds. In stage 3, after recycling process, they are into new glasses. Once this step is completed, they are refilled with beverage such as milk, bear, wine, so on and deliveried to supermarket. At then, they ready to be sold.
Overview, reprocessing way glass was include 3 stage with 10 steps.
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 61
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 61
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10303030303 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68611366319 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2446080688 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.1428571429 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7857142857 22.9334400587 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0507565768683 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.021426112423 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0240754150193 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335318777864 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00660304805102 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.41 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.