The pictures depict the alterations of Paradise island, comparing the past with the present.
The pictures depict the alterations of Paradise island, comparing the past with the present.
Overall, the island has modernized with numerous infrastructure and amenities. In addition, there is a slight change that the shape of the island is enlarged a little.
According to the two diagrams, the beach at the top-left corner is shrunk now and permits people to swim in. Similarly, the pier beneath the beach is widened and allows huge cruise ships to go through, compared to the past, which just accepted small boats. Moreover, the balm trees are cut down and the natural spring is shrunk in order to make way for infrastructure and amenities serving entertainment such as the cafe zone, the open restaurant, and the BBQ area; which is in the west and the midst of the island.
There is a hall connecting the center open restaurant to the swimming pool and hotel complex region, which was a scientific research station. Furthermore, there is a spot for people to go sightseeing at the top-right corner called scenic lookout. Otherwise, people can cycle on the cycling path along the BBQ area.
- The two pictures compare transformations of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001 78
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- the diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish https www testbig com sites default files styles max 650x650 public preview png itok 1isRGv0K
- The pictures depict the alterations of Paradise island comparing the past with the present 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, similarly, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73935151988 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7661696062 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282392522791 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148262125184 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.304910241815 0.0843802449381 361% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303838314353 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.40522623154 0.0819641961636 494% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.