The two pictures compare transformations of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001.
The two pictures compare transformations of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001.
As can be seen from these, there was a significant alteration on the right of the North of this place. In addition, the South of Felixstone became a spot serving tourism.
According to the two diagrams, in the north, the Golf course almost remained while the shops which were directly opposite were enlarged, and the right one of the two was demolished to build apartments. Similarly, the farmland was flattened out to construct an area including a swimming pool, hotel, and tennis courts.
Looking at the maps for more details, numerous wind turbines were installed as well as there were more trees planted and dunes. Furthermore, the hotel area was widened by opening a car park next to it, whereas the cafe remained. Finally, the region for trading and purchasing like the fish market and the place for ships and boats to land such as Pier and Marina were demolished in order to recreate the beach area, which included public beach and private beach separately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-13 | Sandeep USA | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Sakib | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | mocmoc2610 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | fdsugb22 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 61
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 73
- The two pictures compare transformations of Felixstone between 1967 and 2001 78
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94886363636 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62605129479 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647727272727 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8001676036 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.625 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202017799796 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143289353941 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.325278790109 0.0843802449381 385% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275162435426 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.419021605274 0.0819641961636 511% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.