The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The rendered pictures illustrate the modifications of a particular area Shipsmouth from 1995 to 2010. It is manifest that this area experienced number of changes in the given time period.

In 1995, in the mid of the Shipsmouth, it was a city center and a road is passing through the city center. In the front of the city center in the South side, there was a station and going to the West from the station it was a water area. A factory is situated in the left side of city center, looking at the North-west there were some trees. A church was built in the right side side of the map. Moreover, In the middle of the East side, there a housing area amd in the South side of the housing area, there were also some trees.

In 2010, the most predominant changes of the town is that the road had been renovated into for the pedestrians. The Southern south was as it is however it was one more station in the opposite side of the first station. The factory was eliminated and apartment blocks and a shoppong center established. Along with shopping center, a football stadium was constructed. The housing area removed and skyscrapers were built. Tree area is knocked down of South-east side and an airport was made. Finally, the church was replaced into a pub.

Overall, it is crystal clear that the Shipsmouth area was changed almost entirely. However, the water area and the Southern station did not change.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: side
... trees. A church was built in the right side side of the map. Moreover, In the middle of ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.0 314% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60317460317 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52465793866 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7207784318 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0719267121425 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323694827844 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622387209956 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745134576443 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690098482687 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.