The pie chart and table are showing the causes of the worldwide land degradation and degradation by regions during 1990s.
The pie chart and table are showing the causes of the worldwide land degradation and degradation by regions during 1990s.
The causes of worldwide land degradation are over-grazing, deforestation, over-cultivation and other which percent are by 35% for over-grazing, deforestation by 30%, over-cultivation by 28% and followed by 7% other.
The degradation by regions are North America, by 0.2 deforestation, over-cultivation by 3.3% and over-grazing by 7.7% which mean in total land degradation for North America is by 5% the second is Europe– deforestation by 9.8%, over-cultivation by 7.7% and by 5.5% over-grazing which all in total for the European land degradation is by 23% .
In contrast, Oceania by 1.7 deforestation, 0% for over-cultivation and over-grazing by 11.3% .Oceania which is a large group of islands in the south pacific including: Australia and New Zеaland and all in total for the land degradation is be 13%.
In conclusion the biggest per cent for the worldwide land degradation by 35% is over-grazing and followed by degradation by region ,Europe by 23% which is in total land degraded
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-23 | Martin9604 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took plaece in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012 73
- The figure gives information about smoking habits of the UK population by age. 78
- In some countries people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing and starting university studies. 56
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of population aged 65 over between 1940-2040 in a period of 100 years in three different countries.They are: USA, Sweden and Japan 73
- Universities should accept equal members of male and female students in every subject. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
... degradation and degradation by regions during 1990s. The causes of worldwide land degrad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ation by 28% and followed by 7% other. The degradation by regions are North Americ...
^^^
Line 4, column 340, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the European land degradation is by 23% . In contrast, Oceania by 1.7 deforest...
^^
Line 6, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...er-cultivation and over-grazing by 11.3% .Oceania which is a large group of island...
^^
Line 6, column 95, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Oceania
...-cultivation and over-grazing by 11.3% .Oceania which is a large group of islands in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is a large group of islands in the south pacific including: Australia and New Zе...
^^
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e group of islands in the south pacific including: Australia and New Zеaland and...
^^
Line 6, column 242, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ll in total for the land degradation is be 13%. In conclusion the biggest per c...
^^
Line 8, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng and followed by degradation by region ,Europe by 23% which is in total land deg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.97073170732 453% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38068181818 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.72504517679 2.65546596893 140% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426136363636 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3505211818 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.4 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387600251168 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.345159419454 0.103423049105 334% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.339412702545 0.0843802449381 402% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345159419454 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.339412702545 0.0819641961636 414% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 61.2550243902 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.51609756098 244% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 23.5 11.4329268293 206% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.