The pie chart and table are showing the causes of the worldwide land degradation and degradation by regions during 1990s.

Essay topics:

The pie chart and table are showing the causes of the worldwide land degradation and degradation by regions during 1990s.

The diagram highlights some factors which were stimulated land degradation in the world during 1990s.

In general, the land degradation were excogitated by over-grazing, deforestation, over-cultivation, as well as other which it means was caused by humans, earthquake, flood, as well as over-industrialization, relatively. moreover, the highest factors of land degradation is over-grazing which reach to 3%, while the lowest factors was made by the other which less than 10%.

The term of deforestation was indicated as the second factors which was caused land degradation till 30%. moreover, the third factors of land degradation is over-cultivation which attain 28%.

To sum up, even though over-grazing was positioned as the main factors, however the percentage of deforestation and over-cultivation tend to close to the top one.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-12 fachryadul92 56 view
2019-02-23 Martin9604 67 view
Essays by user fachryadul92 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...timulated land degradation in the world during 1990s. In general, the land degradation we...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
... as over-industrialization, relatively. moreover, the highest factors of land degradatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...h was caused land degradation till 30%. moreover, the third factors of land degradation ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, so, third, well, while, in fact, in general, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 125.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.736 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.34370152488 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.83332753623 2.65546596893 144% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8209074065 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.5 5.23603664747 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1973576579 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128077467443 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747666998981 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143895655331 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928379684329 0.0819641961636 113% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.