The given pie chart depicts the contribution of causes in worldwide land degradation, whilst the table provides with information about regions that were affected by these reasons over the 1990s.
According to pie chart, the main cause of quality decline of sail was over-grazing globally, which degraded nearly 11% of the land of Oceania. On the contrary, North America suffered from this factor least of all. Furthermore, deforestation and over-cultivation accounted for sail erosion, having approximately equal percentage – nearly 30%. As an effect clearance of forestland caused deterioration of rich soil layer in almost 10% of European countries, whereas over-plantation resulted in nearly 8% of European land becoming less productive.
In global seale, Europe experienced the highest level of land degradation, which was estimated to be 23%. With regard to islands in the South Pacific, roughly as half of land as in European region became inarable. Totally, only 5% of North American ground was degraded by all three factors, mostly after cultivating period of time.
On the whole, three human activities in agriculture led to sail deterioration all around the world during the last decade of 20th century.
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 78
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000. 56
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies? 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reading the newspaper or online news sources is a waste of time Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...three factors, mostly after cultivating period of time. On the whole, three human activities ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, whereas, on the contrary, on the whole, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44973544974 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06367939042 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687830687831 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8379433254 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299982839706 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101611911988 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878253391765 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164750282327 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07335668098 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.