The Pie chart below shows the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The Pie chart illustrates the average spent on household in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
At first sight we can obviously see that families in both countries spent most of their money on housing, food and other goods as well as services, whereas health care and transport played a peripheral role with lower expenditure.
Focus on Japan we can deduce from the graph that in 2010 other goods and services accounted for 29% of household expenditure which is the highest of all. The average spent on food is also noticeable with almost a quarter of the total expenditure whilst housing and transport ‘s figures are pretty similar with the proportion of 21% and 20%, respectively. The lowest place is Health care with just 6% of the total expenditure.
As for Malaysia the highest household spent in 2010 is credited to housing with 34% of total household spent. After that is Food which occupied 27% and Other good and device with just one percent lower. The average household expenditure on transport is scant with only 10% of the total ones and health care is even lower with mere 3%.
- The Pie chart below shows the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 45
- The table and chart show the time spent at leisure and household activities in 2008 67
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips What are the drawbacks of this development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...th just 6% of the total expenditure. As for Malaysia the highest household spen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81914893617 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51457948861 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5064248479 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144391074116 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908754146138 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111892758295 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140052560941 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133113644592 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.