Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips What are the drawbacks of this development

Essay topics:

Smart devices have put all of the world’s information at our fingertips. What are the drawbacks of this development?

In today's world it's much easier for people to gain information thanks to the existence of technology. By using computers or smartphones we can easily access to up-to-date news and find the information we need. Despite its convenience, the development of smart devices has raised some critical drawbacks. The increasing of fake news and lost privacy will prove this.

Firstly, information online is able to spread incredibly quickly in a short amount of time. However, there are only a few sources that has been verified and the rest are often inaccurate and copied from others. A good example of this is the false news about the death of celebrities. This kind of information often spread rapidly in online platforms such as Facebook and Youtube and has misled many people. Thus it is hard for us to avoid misinformation and find a reliable source when reading online.

Additionally, smart devices have made people lost their privacy. For instance, there was a student in my country who was recorded when doing an embarrassing activity. After that video was uploaded there were a lot of people teasing at him, some of them even criticized his ridiculous action and that caused him severe depression. As this example shows, it is clear that modern technology's ability to instantly spread information can have negative effects and consequences on people.

In conclusion, although smart devices give a great help in finding information, these devices still have a huge downside in terms of reliability and privacy. It might take a long time for the government to find a way to solve these problems.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-03 Hanabi 78 view
2020-08-26 nkaur1311 89 view
2018-04-10 Anator 95 view
2015-06-01 Cafofo 85 view
Essays by user Hanabi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...and Youtube and has misled many people. Thus it is hard for us to avoid misinformati...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82907147761 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62641509434 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8830050351 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206841371846 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617703577014 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536298519746 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113926481871 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315943659502 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.