The pie chart below shows information about where coffee is produced, consumed and where is profit goes.
The pie charts illustrate a division of the production and consumption of coffee in particular regions, and how the profits are distributed.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that whilst South American was recorded to be the number one coffee-producing area, it is European that consumed that highest amount of coffee. Additionally, the majority of the profit earned from this industry goes to the shippers.
As far as coffee production is concerned, 44% of production coffee came from South American, making it the leading supplier of coffee worldwide. Only had a little difference among the three areas, namely Africa, Central American and Asia, with the numbers in turn 19%, 17% and 18%. Meanwhile, Oceania just constituted 2% of the total coffee production. Regarding coffee distribution, European was the country that used the most coffee, with the figures accounting for more than half, 55% specifically. By contrast, Japan and North American at only reached 7% and 11%, respectively. The remaining 27% belongs to other unknown regions.
Profits made from the production, transport and sale of coffee aren't evenly shared among all those involved in the process. Shippers who earned the most with 55% total of the profit, Sellers stood the second location with at 27%, while the rest of profit was divided for explorer and manufacturer at 7% and 11%, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-15 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 73
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 69
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 89
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...roduction, transport and sale of coffee arent evenly shared among all those involved ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, second, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26126126126 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90598848818 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617117117117 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0795216343 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162445314501 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600979075081 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513241717519 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11546631846 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439143600937 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...roduction, transport and sale of coffee arent evenly shared among all those involved ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, regarding, second, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26126126126 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90598848818 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617117117117 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0795216343 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.181818182 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162445314501 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600979075081 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513241717519 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11546631846 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439143600937 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.