The pie chart below shows the main reasoans of why agricultural land becomes productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart illustrates the main factors of worldwide land deforestation and the table represents how to spread those factors in three different regions(North America, Europe and Oceania) in the world in 1990. Overall, according to the pie chart, the major reason for the decline in agricultural production was overgrazing and the region of have been greatest effected of agricultural land was Europe.
In addition, the percentage of overgrazing in the worldwide land was 35%and also the proportion of deforestation was 5% less than overgrazing. Furthermore, became the third place of a factor of land degeneration was over-cultivation and next to other reasons that the quantity of those reasons were 28% and 7% respectively.
On the other hand, Oceania where is the large group of island in the south pacific including Australia and New Zealand have been set down by over-cultivation in 1990. However, Europe has been increased the quantity of cutting trees among other areas that was approximately 10%. Indeed, the lowest percentage of wastage land degeneration constituted in North America.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australian and France in 1980 and 2000 61
- The map below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. Do you agree or disagree. 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 78
- The plan below shows the layout of a university's sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'America' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'Americas'.
Suggestion: Americas
...factors in three different regionsNorth America, Europe and Oceania in the world in 199...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, third, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38953488372 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22721555325 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7796467841 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137748848986 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061435021726 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729524149427 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974744566576 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104085048288 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.