The given pie chart iiustrates the 4 major reasons of agricultural land reducing. The table gives 4 causes affected three parts of the world during the 1990s.
Overall, it can be clear that overgrazing was the biggest cause which consists 35%. The deforestation was less bigger than over-cultivation, 30 per cent and 28 per cent respectively.
However, in different regions given causes affected differently. In North America 3.3% per cent land degraded by over-cultivation while in Europe 7.7 per cent and it can be obviously that in the Oceania wasn't over-cultivation at all. Deforestation in Europe was approximately 10 per cent while in North America it was under 1 per cent.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Bhinder Raman
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005
- In some countries the high rates of crimes are committed by teenagers why this has happened the effects of the happenings 67
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to more than technology in homes in the UK
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less big'?
Suggestion: less big
...ich consists 35%. The deforestation was less bigger than over-cultivation, 30 per cent and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...it can be obviously that in the Oceania wasnt over-cultivation at all. Deforestation ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 577.0 965.302439024 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 111.0 196.424390244 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1981981982 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.24586718041 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35940618774 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 171.0 283.868780488 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6923991403 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8571428571 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133590066957 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809215113473 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797859828378 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122174704285 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118965745138 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.