The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The given graph illustrates the main causes of the less productive agriculture land. While, the table explains how land becomes less productivity for three regions including North American, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s.
It is evident that the main reason causes the land degradation is an over-grazing in the world. While the highest reason in Europe causes the land degradation is deforestation.
When it comes to pie graph, it describes the four reasons for land declination. Initially, the highest reason for the land’s Devolution is deforestation with 28%. Then the second highest reason is an over-grazing with its proportion thirty percent. The second smallest reason for declined land is an over-cultivation with its proportion 28%. Moreover, 7% of the degraded land is affected By other unknown reasons.
The given table gives information about land degradation in three different regions. Furthermore, the region has the highest land degradation is in a Europe with 23 as a total percentage. However, the lowest degraded land is in North America with 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dation is an over-grazing in the world. While the highest reason in Europe causes the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40828402367 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07594431406 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9844600192 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1666666667 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280467987064 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116334360816 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732344597978 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191351731348 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926030133896 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.