The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make the comparison where relevant.
The given graph illustrates the main causes of the less productive agriculture. While the table explains the less productive land of three regions including North American, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s.
It is evident that the main reason causes the land degradation is an over-grazing in the world. While the highest reason in Europe causes the land degradation is deforestation.
when it comes to pie graph, it describes the four reasons for land degradation. Initially, the highest reason for the land’s degradation is deforestation with 28%. Then the second highest reason is an over-grazing with its proportion thirty percent. The second smallest reason for degraded land is an over-cultivation with 28%. Moreover, 7% of the degraded land is affected by other unknown reasons.
The given table gives information about land degradation in three different regions. Furthermore, the region has the highest degraded land is in a Europe with 23 as a total percentage. However, the lowest degraded land is in North America with 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dation is an over-grazing in the world. While the highest reason in Europe causes the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...the land degradation is deforestation. when it comes to pie graph, it describes the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35757575758 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06419831192 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 16.356064115 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.6666666667 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216040571229 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966577713291 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055300882172 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155850500003 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555733653834 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.