Question- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
In various nations around the world, the museums should have fees for entering while others do not believe that, this is clearly drawbacks for this. However, I personally think the advantages are more significant than the disadvantages.
Firstly, if the government restricts the accessing to museums, many people will not see the history of their country, because they do not have enough money to spend it for museums. For example, in Syria, most people under the poverty line and they do not have a lot of money to pay for charges of museums. As a result, they will not give them a chance to see historical tools inside national museums. The restricting of poorer people from seeing their history will prevent a large number of population from historical knowledge.
On the other hand, there are numerous advantages from setting charges for museums. The visitors of museums will feel the important value of that location, and then they will try to be careful about their movement. Moreover, the government will achieve significant income from these fees, it will help the authorities in improving the services of their people, for instance, the Syrian government uses the charges from museums in the income of the country. The charges from museums consider important income for many countries around the world.
In conclusion, some people consider the charges of museums important income for their nations, while others advocate about making the accessing to museums is free. Consequently, the countries which allow to their people and tourists have a look about the history of them. This knowledge will give the country keen repetition. I recommend that the advantages for museum’s charge are more than the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... from seeing their history will prevent a large number of population from historical knowledge. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19285714286 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68756585112 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9672052324 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.857142857 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341532388413 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138897021335 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111613092821 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229984563406 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614084712379 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.