The first circular representation highlights the information about the causes of land degradation which had been done worldwide, and the tabular chart reveals the information about how much land had degraded in three regions by the following three reasons during the year: 1990. The data is given in per centum.
Overall, it is evident that europe is a region where most of the land had been degraded. However, the biggest cause of land degradation was deforestation whereas, North America had the lowest percentage of land degraded.
It can be seen that overgrazing was the major cause of the entire global's degradation because 35% of land had been spoiled just because of it. Moreover, many trees were cut down and it led to deforestation as 30% of total land had degraded due to this reason. Furthermore, 28% of land was being degraded because of over-cultivation. People had grown varioud crops above from the limit. In addition to this, 7% land became degraded due to other reasons.
As far as trend was concerned, 5% of total land of North America was degraded in which 0.2% of land degradation had been done due to deforestation and 3.3 and 1.5% of land became degraded due to over-cultivation and over grazing respectively while total of23% land of europe region was degraded due to the following reasons with the percentage: 9.8, 7.7 and 5.5.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 95
- The diagram below show how glass containers,such as bottles , are produced and recycled. 73
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 83
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 84
- one should obly use enough money to fulfill their needs and rest should be given to needy . To what extent you agree or disagree ? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94298245614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90146413937 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.413594697 43.030603864 233% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 112.7 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119484435898 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526560248235 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506124153994 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945209557789 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495565168144 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.