The pie charts represent the information about production of electricity from resources which can be renewable and others all type of material mainly in two countries is Germany and France by 2009.
It is crystal clear from graph that in 2009, all type of material experienced most significant difference in nuclear for producing electricity which was contributed 23.3% in Germany and showed a just above five fold rise to 76% in France. In contrast, the electricity generated from renewable increased slightly by 4.5% in Germany as compared to France. conventional thermal had been produced power energy 59.6% 10.3% in Germany and France respectively.
Further scrutinizing the graph, the least amount of energy had been generated by solar energy in both countries, However, the highest amount of power energy was generated by hydroelectric in France more 80% whereas it was the second last popular in Germany with 17.7%. As well as biomass had noticed 5 fold rise in Germany as compared to France in the given period of time. In addition, the second biggest share at about a third for Germany by wind 36% and only 10.1% was contributed by same in France.
Overall, nuclear and hydroelectric were the biggest sources which generate electricity in the France and conventional thermal and biomass were considered as a first priority in Germany.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducing electricity which was contributed 23.3% in Germany and showed a just above...
^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...23.3% in Germany and showed a just above five fold rise to 76% in France. In cont...
^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rise' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rises'.
Suggestion: rises
...many and showed a just above five fold rise to 76% in France. In contrast, the elec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icity generated from renewable increased slightly by 4.5% in Germany as compared ...
^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conventional
... 4.5% in Germany as compared to France. conventional thermal had been produced power energy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to France. conventional thermal had been produced power energy 59.6% 10.3% in Ger...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...in Germany and France respectively. Further scrutinizing the graph, the least amoun...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was generated by hydroelectric in France more 80% whereas it was the second last ...
^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'rise' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'rises'.
Suggestion: rises
.... As well as biomass had noticed 5 fold rise in Germany as compared to France in the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...many as compared to France in the given period of time. In addition, the second biggest share ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. Overall, nuclear and hydroelectric were the biggest sources which generate ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, whereas, in addition, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18721461187 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86027047359 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0553028 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.875 5.23603664747 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246209653567 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11436652976 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823920286193 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165873958447 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851999324307 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.